_hearing-clash-jim-jordan-and-adam-schiff-spar-during-contentious-house-judiciary-markup.jpg "HEARING CLASH: Jim Jordan And Adam Schiff Spar During Contentious House Judiciary Markup from did hearing Video Screenshot Preview")
GalleryPlay Video:
(Note: The default playback of the video is HD VERSION. If your browser is buffering the video slowly, please play the REGULAR MP4 VERSION or Open The Video below for better experience. Thank you!)
⏲ Duration: 4:50
👁 View: 95M times
✓ Published: 28-Jun-2024
👁 View: 95M times
✓ Published: 28-Jun-2024
Description:
At a House Judiciary Committee markup on Thursday, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) sparred over the committee's contacts with the White House. <br/><br/>Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:<br/><br/>https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript<br/><br/><br/>Stay Connected<br/>Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes<br/>Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes<br/>Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes<br/>More From Forbes:http://forbes.com
At a House Judiciary Committee markup on Thursday, Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) and Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) sparred over the committee's contacts with the White House. <br/><br/>Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:<br/><br/>https://account.forbes.com/membership/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=display&utm_campaign=growth_non-sub_paid_subscribe_ytdescript<br/><br/><br/>Stay Connected<br/>Forbes on Facebook: http://fb.com/forbes<br/>Forbes Video on Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/forbes<br/>Forbes Video on Instagram: http://instagram.com/forbes<br/>More From Forbes:http://forbes.com
Share with your friends:
Whatsapp | Viber | Telegram | Line | SMS
Email | Twitter | Reddit | Tumblr | Pinterest
_why-hearing-aids-are-so-expensive-and-how-that39s-changing.webp "CNBC")
_the-science-of-hearing-douglas-l-oliver.webp "TED-Ed")
_supreme-court-rules-against-sec39s-authority-to-impose-fines.webp "Supreme Court Rules , Against SEC's Authority, to Impose Fines.<br/>NPR reports that the United States Supreme Court <br/>recently voted 6-3 against the Securities and <br/>Exchange Commission's policy on fraudulent conduct. .<br/>NPR reports that the United States Supreme Court <br/>recently voted 6-3 against the Securities and <br/>Exchange Commission's policy on fraudulent conduct. .<br/>Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the court's <br/>conservative majority, said the current rules deprive accused <br/>transgressors of their constitutional right to a jury trial. .<br/>Chief Justice John Roberts, writing for the court's <br/>conservative majority, said the current rules deprive accused <br/>transgressors of their constitutional right to a jury trial. .<br/>The SEC relies on administrative <br/>law judges (ALJ) to make legal conclusions <br/>in cases brought before the agency.<br/>The Supreme Court's decision has the potential <br/>to send ripples through dozens of agencies, <br/>from labor rights to energy regulation.<br/>The Court did exclude from its decision those <br/>agencies dealing with federal benefits, while some <br/>conservative justices wanted the ruling to go further.<br/>The three liberal justices<br/>in dissent blasted the <br/>decision by the majority. .<br/>The case was brought by a former conservative <br/>radio host and hedge fund manager, George Jarkesy, <br/>following an SEC fraud investigation.<br/>The case was brought by a former conservative <br/>radio host and hedge fund manager, George Jarkesy, <br/>following an SEC fraud investigation.<br/>An in-house evidentiary hearing fined Jarkesy $300,000, <br/>ordered him to pay back almost $700,000 in ill-gotten <br/>profits and barred him from the securities industry.<br/>Jarkesy argued that he was entitled to a jury trial <br/>held in a federal court and that Congress lacked <br/>the power to delegate such authority to the SEC.<br/>NPR reports that Jarkesy's case was supported <br/>by a number of conservative and business groups, and individuals such as Elon Musk.<br/>NPR reports that Jarkesy's case was supported <br/>by a number of conservative and business groups, and individuals such as Elon Musk")
_asmr-hearing-test.webp "BehindTheMoons")
_why-hearing-aids-are-so-expensive-and-how-that39s-changing.jpg)
_the-science-of-hearing-douglas-l-oliver.jpg)
_supreme-court-rules-against-sec39s-authority-to-impose-fines.jpg)
_asmr-hearing-test.jpg)
![[+]](/images/menu.gif){kind=small}