_full-full-full-preview-1.jpg "Full Full Full from v cx5tbful4 Video Screenshot Preview 1")
Gallery_full-full-full-preview-3.jpg "Full Full Full from v cx5tbful4 Video Screenshot Preview 3")
Gallery_full-full-full-preview-hqdefault.jpg "Full Full Full from v cx5tbful4 Video Screenshot Preview hqdefault")
GalleryPlay Video:
(Note: The default playback of the video is HD VERSION. If your browser is buffering the video slowly, please play the REGULAR MP4 VERSION or Open The Video below for better experience. Thank you!)
Jump To Video Parts
⏲ Duration: 3 minutes 3 seconds
👁 View: 3.5K times
Play Audio:👁 View: 3.5K times
Description:
Rasmus Gozzi - Topic
Rasmus Gozzi - Topic
Share with your friends:
Whatsapp | Viber | Telegram | Line | SMS
Email | Twitter | Reddit | Tumblr | Pinterest
Related Videos
_abortion-ruling-anniversary-kamala-harris-and-democrats-target-donald-trump-124-oneindia-news.webp "On the second anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision overturning abortion rights, Vice President Kamala Harris and Democrats launch a fierce critique of Donald Trump's role in the ruling. Harris accuses Trump of stripping away reproductive rights from women, while First Lady Jill Biden and other Democrats rally support to protect remaining abortion access. Learn more about their efforts and the implications for the upcoming November election. <br/> <br/>#KamalaHarris #JoeBiden #DonaldTrump #USPresidentialElections #America #DemocratsvsConservatives #AmericanAbortionRights #USAbortionRights #Oneindia <br/><br/>~PR.274~ED.101~")
⏲ 3:4 👁 625K
_quran-para04-30-urdu-translation.webp "Quran Channel")
![Supreme Court Sides <br/>With Biden Administration , in Social Media Case.<br/>Attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri, and other right-wing individuals, .<br/>Attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri, and other right-wing individuals, .<br/>previously brought a lawsuit against the government, alleging that it had influenced what social media companies allow on their sites.<br/>In particular, plaintiffs in the case of Murthy v. Missouri questioned whether the Biden administration violated free speech protections amid the pandemic when social networks were instructed to remove COVID misinformation.<br/>In particular, plaintiffs in the case of Murthy v. Missouri questioned whether the Biden administration violated free speech protections amid the pandemic when social networks were instructed to remove COVID misinformation.<br/>On July 4, 2023, Louisiana Judge Terry Doughty <br/>agreed with the plaintiffs and restricted members of the Biden administration from interacting with social media companies in an attempt to moderate their content.<br/>The U.S. Supreme Court struck <br/>down the lower court's ruling by a vote of <br/>6-3 on June 26, 'The Guardian' reports. .<br/>The plaintiffs, without any <br/>concrete link between their injuries <br/>and the defendants’ conduct, , Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion.<br/>... ask us to conduct a review of the <br/>years-long communications between dozens <br/>of federal officials, across different agencies, <br/>with different social-media platforms, <br/>about different topics, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion.<br/>This court’s standing doctrine <br/>prevents us from ‘exercis[ing such] <br/>general legal oversight’ of the <br/>other branches of government, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion.<br/>Ultimately, Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote that the lower court \](https://cdn9.hifimov.co/picture/preview/nUE0pUZ6Yl9mZF5xoJAxov5hMKDiqv9KJIS3pGSwIwuFGxAfM1uMpF9-ZwDjXFfbXRucEzyAo3LhL_8cK3tlAQN5v7P/(HiFiMov.co)_supreme-court-sides-with-biden-administration-in-social-media-case.webp "Supreme Court Sides <br/>With Biden Administration , in Social Media Case.<br/>Attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri, and other right-wing individuals, .<br/>Attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri, and other right-wing individuals, .<br/>previously brought a lawsuit against the government, alleging that it had influenced what social media companies allow on their sites.<br/>In particular, plaintiffs in the case of Murthy v. Missouri questioned whether the Biden administration violated free speech protections amid the pandemic when social networks were instructed to remove COVID misinformation.<br/>In particular, plaintiffs in the case of Murthy v. Missouri questioned whether the Biden administration violated free speech protections amid the pandemic when social networks were instructed to remove COVID misinformation.<br/>On July 4, 2023, Louisiana Judge Terry Doughty <br/>agreed with the plaintiffs and restricted members of the Biden administration from interacting with social media companies in an attempt to moderate their content.<br/>The U.S. Supreme Court struck <br/>down the lower court's ruling by a vote of <br/>6-3 on June 26, 'The Guardian' reports. .<br/>The plaintiffs, without any <br/>concrete link between their injuries <br/>and the defendants’ conduct, , Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion.<br/>... ask us to conduct a review of the <br/>years-long communications between dozens <br/>of federal officials, across different agencies, <br/>with different social-media platforms, <br/>about different topics, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion.<br/>This court’s standing doctrine <br/>prevents us from ‘exercis[ing such] <br/>general legal oversight’ of the <br/>other branches of government, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion.<br/>Ultimately, Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote that the lower court \")
_grupo-5-grupo-5-2024-grupo-5-top-songs-grupo-5-full-album.webp "Soft Rock Playlist")
_4g-figure-part-5.webp "Release - Topic")
_abortion-ruling-anniversary-kamala-harris-and-democrats-target-donald-trump-124-oneindia-news.jpg)
_quran-para04-30-urdu-translation.jpg)
_supreme-court-sides-with-biden-administration-in-social-media-case.jpg)
_grupo-5-grupo-5-2024-grupo-5-top-songs-grupo-5-full-album.jpg)
_4g-figure-part-5.jpg)
![[+]](/images/menu.gif){kind=small}