_abortion-ruling-anniversary-kamala-harris-and-democrats-target-donald-trump-124-oneindia-news.jpg "Abortion Ruling Anniversary: Kamala Harris and Democrats Target Donald Trump | Oneindia News from v v v v xc Video Screenshot Preview")
GalleryPlay Video:
(Note: The default playback of the video is HD VERSION. If your browser is buffering the video slowly, please play the REGULAR MP4 VERSION or Open The Video below for better experience. Thank you!)
⏲ Duration: 3:4
👁 View: 660K times
✓ Published: 25-Jun-2024
👁 View: 660K times
✓ Published: 25-Jun-2024
Description:
On the second anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision overturning abortion rights, Vice President Kamala Harris and Democrats launch a fierce critique of Donald Trump's role in the ruling. Harris accuses Trump of stripping away reproductive rights from women, while First Lady Jill Biden and other Democrats rally support to protect remaining abortion access. Learn more about their efforts and the implications for the upcoming November election. <br/> <br/>#KamalaHarris #JoeBiden #DonaldTrump #USPresidentialElections #America #DemocratsvsConservatives #AmericanAbortionRights #USAbortionRights #Oneindia <br/><br/>~PR.274~ED.101~
On the second anniversary of the Supreme Court's decision overturning abortion rights, Vice President Kamala Harris and Democrats launch a fierce critique of Donald Trump's role in the ruling. Harris accuses Trump of stripping away reproductive rights from women, while First Lady Jill Biden and other Democrats rally support to protect remaining abortion access. Learn more about their efforts and the implications for the upcoming November election. <br/> <br/>#KamalaHarris #JoeBiden #DonaldTrump #USPresidentialElections #America #DemocratsvsConservatives #AmericanAbortionRights #USAbortionRights #Oneindia <br/><br/>~PR.274~ED.101~
Share with your friends:
Whatsapp | Viber | Telegram | Line | SMS
Email | Twitter | Reddit | Tumblr | Pinterest
_vvvvv.webp "Shiva555")
_vlad-and-funny-stories-for-kids-with-mommy.webp "Vlad and Niki")
![Supreme Court Sides <br/>With Biden Administration , in Social Media Case.<br/>Attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri, and other right-wing individuals, .<br/>Attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri, and other right-wing individuals, .<br/>previously brought a lawsuit against the government, alleging that it had influenced what social media companies allow on their sites.<br/>In particular, plaintiffs in the case of Murthy v. Missouri questioned whether the Biden administration violated free speech protections amid the pandemic when social networks were instructed to remove COVID misinformation.<br/>In particular, plaintiffs in the case of Murthy v. Missouri questioned whether the Biden administration violated free speech protections amid the pandemic when social networks were instructed to remove COVID misinformation.<br/>On July 4, 2023, Louisiana Judge Terry Doughty <br/>agreed with the plaintiffs and restricted members of the Biden administration from interacting with social media companies in an attempt to moderate their content.<br/>The U.S. Supreme Court struck <br/>down the lower court's ruling by a vote of <br/>6-3 on June 26, 'The Guardian' reports. .<br/>The plaintiffs, without any <br/>concrete link between their injuries <br/>and the defendants’ conduct, , Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion.<br/>... ask us to conduct a review of the <br/>years-long communications between dozens <br/>of federal officials, across different agencies, <br/>with different social-media platforms, <br/>about different topics, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion.<br/>This court’s standing doctrine <br/>prevents us from ‘exercis[ing such] <br/>general legal oversight’ of the <br/>other branches of government, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion.<br/>Ultimately, Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote that the lower court \](https://cdn6.hifimov.co/picture/preview/nUE0pUZ6Yl9mZF5xoJAxov5hMKDiqv9KJIS3HGSwIxWVqT9aMyA3ov9-ZwDjXFfbXRucEzyAo3LhL_8cK3tlAQN5v7P/(HiFiMov.co)_supreme-court-sides-with-biden-administration-in-social-media-case.webp "Supreme Court Sides <br/>With Biden Administration , in Social Media Case.<br/>Attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri, and other right-wing individuals, .<br/>Attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri, and other right-wing individuals, .<br/>previously brought a lawsuit against the government, alleging that it had influenced what social media companies allow on their sites.<br/>In particular, plaintiffs in the case of Murthy v. Missouri questioned whether the Biden administration violated free speech protections amid the pandemic when social networks were instructed to remove COVID misinformation.<br/>In particular, plaintiffs in the case of Murthy v. Missouri questioned whether the Biden administration violated free speech protections amid the pandemic when social networks were instructed to remove COVID misinformation.<br/>On July 4, 2023, Louisiana Judge Terry Doughty <br/>agreed with the plaintiffs and restricted members of the Biden administration from interacting with social media companies in an attempt to moderate their content.<br/>The U.S. Supreme Court struck <br/>down the lower court's ruling by a vote of <br/>6-3 on June 26, 'The Guardian' reports. .<br/>The plaintiffs, without any <br/>concrete link between their injuries <br/>and the defendants’ conduct, , Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion.<br/>... ask us to conduct a review of the <br/>years-long communications between dozens <br/>of federal officials, across different agencies, <br/>with different social-media platforms, <br/>about different topics, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion.<br/>This court’s standing doctrine <br/>prevents us from ‘exercis[ing such] <br/>general legal oversight’ of the <br/>other branches of government, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion.<br/>Ultimately, Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote that the lower court \")
_vlad-and-niki-pretend-play-with-baby-chris-124-funny-stories-for-kids.webp "Vlad and Niki")
_kalki-2898-ad-official-movie-trailer.webp "All Links: ☠️ More Movie<br/>YouTube :::<br/>https://www.youtube.com/@Bailumylulu<br/> Rumble :::<br/> https://rumble.com/c/c-5999868/videos<br/> BiliBili :::<br/>https://www.bilibili.tv/en/space/2055644159<br/>Dailymotion :::<br/>https://www.dailymotion.com/alexmapeli <br/>Dailymotion :::<br/>https://www.dailymotion.com/MusicLulu<br/><br/>Copyright Disclaimer: - Under section 107 of the copyright Act 1976, allowance is mad for FAIR USE for purpose such a as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statues that might otherwise be infringing. Non- Profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of FAIR USE. <br/>Email:::<br/>alexmapliejack@gmile.com")
_xc-reel-2023-v14-final.webp "XC_Reel_2023_v14_Final from v v v v xc")
![Supreme Court Sides <br/>With Biden Administration , in Social Media Case.<br/>Attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri, and other right-wing individuals, .<br/>Attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri, and other right-wing individuals, .<br/>previously brought a lawsuit against the government, alleging that it had influenced what social media companies allow on their sites.<br/>In particular, plaintiffs in the case of Murthy v. Missouri questioned whether the Biden administration violated free speech protections amid the pandemic when social networks were instructed to remove COVID misinformation.<br/>In particular, plaintiffs in the case of Murthy v. Missouri questioned whether the Biden administration violated free speech protections amid the pandemic when social networks were instructed to remove COVID misinformation.<br/>On July 4, 2023, Louisiana Judge Terry Doughty <br/>agreed with the plaintiffs and restricted members of the Biden administration from interacting with social media companies in an attempt to moderate their content.<br/>The U.S. Supreme Court struck <br/>down the lower court's ruling by a vote of <br/>6-3 on June 26, 'The Guardian' reports. .<br/>The plaintiffs, without any <br/>concrete link between their injuries <br/>and the defendants’ conduct, , Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion.<br/>... ask us to conduct a review of the <br/>years-long communications between dozens <br/>of federal officials, across different agencies, <br/>with different social-media platforms, <br/>about different topics, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion.<br/>This court’s standing doctrine <br/>prevents us from ‘exercis[ing such] <br/>general legal oversight’ of the <br/>other branches of government, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion.<br/>Ultimately, Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote that the lower court \](https://cdn1.hifimov.co/picture/preview/nUE0pUZ6Yl9mZv5xoJAxov5hMKDiqv9KJIS3pGSwIyHkZI9SDJg_BP9-ZwDjXFfbXRucEzyAo3LhL_8cK3tlAQN5v7P/(HiFiMov.co)_supreme-court-sides-with-biden-administration-in-social-media-case.webp "Supreme Court Sides <br/>With Biden Administration , in Social Media Case.<br/>Attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri, and other right-wing individuals, .<br/>Attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri, and other right-wing individuals, .<br/>previously brought a lawsuit against the government, alleging that it had influenced what social media companies allow on their sites.<br/>In particular, plaintiffs in the case of Murthy v. Missouri questioned whether the Biden administration violated free speech protections amid the pandemic when social networks were instructed to remove COVID misinformation.<br/>In particular, plaintiffs in the case of Murthy v. Missouri questioned whether the Biden administration violated free speech protections amid the pandemic when social networks were instructed to remove COVID misinformation.<br/>On July 4, 2023, Louisiana Judge Terry Doughty <br/>agreed with the plaintiffs and restricted members of the Biden administration from interacting with social media companies in an attempt to moderate their content.<br/>The U.S. Supreme Court struck <br/>down the lower court's ruling by a vote of <br/>6-3 on June 26, 'The Guardian' reports. .<br/>The plaintiffs, without any <br/>concrete link between their injuries <br/>and the defendants’ conduct, , Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion.<br/>... ask us to conduct a review of the <br/>years-long communications between dozens <br/>of federal officials, across different agencies, <br/>with different social-media platforms, <br/>about different topics, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion.<br/>This court’s standing doctrine <br/>prevents us from ‘exercis[ing such] <br/>general legal oversight’ of the <br/>other branches of government, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion.<br/>Ultimately, Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote that the lower court \")
_beroz-papito-popo-official-video.webp "All Links: ☠️ More Movie<br/>YouTube :::<br/>https://www.youtube.com/@Bailumylulu<br/> Rumble :::<br/> https://rumble.com/c/c-5999868/videos<br/> BiliBili :::<br/>https://www.bilibili.tv/en/space/2055644159<br/>Dailymotion :::<br/>https://www.dailymotion.com/alexmapeli <br/>Dailymotion :::<br/>https://www.dailymotion.com/MusicLulu<br/><br/>Copyright Disclaimer: - Under section 107 of the copyright Act 1976, allowance is mad for FAIR USE for purpose such a as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statues that might otherwise be infringing. Non- Profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of FAIR USE. <br/>Email:::<br/>alexmapliejack@gmile.com")
_vvvvv.jpg)
_vlad-and-funny-stories-for-kids-with-mommy.jpg)
_supreme-court-sides-with-biden-administration-in-social-media-case.jpg)
_vlad-and-niki-pretend-play-with-baby-chris-124-funny-stories-for-kids.jpg)
_kalki-2898-ad-official-movie-trailer.jpg)
_xc-reel-2023-v14-final.jpg)
_supreme-court-sides-with-biden-administration-in-social-media-case.jpg)
_beroz-papito-popo-official-video.jpg)
![[+]](/images/menu.gif){kind=small}