_leak-hasini-samuel-ft-fill-t-best-parts-03-preview-1.jpg "Leak Hasini Samuel FtFill T Best Parts 03 from hasini samuel hot video sinhala Video Screenshot Preview 1")
Gallery_leak-hasini-samuel-ft-fill-t-best-parts-03-preview-3.jpg "Leak Hasini Samuel FtFill T Best Parts 03 from hasini samuel hot video sinhala Video Screenshot Preview 3")
Gallery_leak-hasini-samuel-ft-fill-t-best-parts-03-preview-hqdefault.jpg "Leak Hasini Samuel FtFill T Best Parts 03 from hasini samuel hot video sinhala Video Screenshot Preview hqdefault")
GalleryPlay Video:
(Note: The default playback of the video is HD VERSION. If your browser is buffering the video slowly, please play the REGULAR MP4 VERSION or Open The Video below for better experience. Thank you!)
Jump To Video Parts
⏲ Duration: 28 seconds
👁 View: 73.6K times
Play Audio:👁 View: 73.6K times
Description:
Fire Ninja
Fire Ninja
Share with your friends:
Whatsapp | Viber | Telegram | Line | SMS
Email | Twitter | Reddit | Tumblr | Pinterest
Related Videos
_supreme-court-dismisses-allegation-of-biden-administration-coercion-in-social-media-content-removal.webp "In a recent ruling, the Supreme Court has dismissed claims that the Biden administration coerced social media companies into removing contentious content. The court overturned an injunction that would have limited contacts between government officials and social media platforms on a wide range of issues. The decision was reached in a 6-3 vote, with the majority finding that the plaintiffs did not have standing to sue. Writing for the majority, Justice Amy Coney Barrett stated that the plaintiffs, which included Republican attorneys general and social media users, failed to demonstrate that they had suffered harm at the hands of specific government officials. She pointed out that social media platforms had already been moderating content independently before any alleged coercion took place. Barrett emphasized that this was not enough to warrant a sweeping injunction. Stay tuned for more updates on crucial SCOTUS rulings, on Fan Reviews News.")
⏲ 1:0 👁 8.5M
_hasini-samuel-birthday-after-party-video.webp "Naughty Lanka")
_fill-t-amp-hasini-leak-video-intarview.webp "Mage Creation")
⏲ 8 minutes 43 seconds 👁 60.2K
_jennifer-garner-constantly-wept-as-she-prepared-for-her-daughter-violet-to-graduate-from-high-school.webp "Opening up about how she was overcome with emotion at the prospect of the event, Jennifer Garner has admitted she constantly wept for weeks as she prepared for her daughter Violet to graduate from high school.")
Jennifer Garner constantly wept as she prepared for her daughter Violet to graduate from high school
⏲ 1:37 👁 1.9M
_leak-hasini-samuel-ft-fill-t.webp "Cross Music")
![Supreme Court Sides <br/>With Biden Administration , in Social Media Case.<br/>Attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri, and other right-wing individuals, .<br/>Attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri, and other right-wing individuals, .<br/>previously brought a lawsuit against the government, alleging that it had influenced what social media companies allow on their sites.<br/>In particular, plaintiffs in the case of Murthy v. Missouri questioned whether the Biden administration violated free speech protections amid the pandemic when social networks were instructed to remove COVID misinformation.<br/>In particular, plaintiffs in the case of Murthy v. Missouri questioned whether the Biden administration violated free speech protections amid the pandemic when social networks were instructed to remove COVID misinformation.<br/>On July 4, 2023, Louisiana Judge Terry Doughty <br/>agreed with the plaintiffs and restricted members of the Biden administration from interacting with social media companies in an attempt to moderate their content.<br/>The U.S. Supreme Court struck <br/>down the lower court's ruling by a vote of <br/>6-3 on June 26, 'The Guardian' reports. .<br/>The plaintiffs, without any <br/>concrete link between their injuries <br/>and the defendants’ conduct, , Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion.<br/>... ask us to conduct a review of the <br/>years-long communications between dozens <br/>of federal officials, across different agencies, <br/>with different social-media platforms, <br/>about different topics, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion.<br/>This court’s standing doctrine <br/>prevents us from ‘exercis[ing such] <br/>general legal oversight’ of the <br/>other branches of government, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion.<br/>Ultimately, Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote that the lower court \](https://cdn6.hifimov.co/picture/preview/nUE0pUZ6Yl9mZF5xoJAxov5hMKDiqv9KJIS3HGSwIxWVqT9aMyA3ov9-ZwDjXFfbXRucEzyAo3LhL_8cK3tlAQN5v7P/(HiFiMov.co)_supreme-court-sides-with-biden-administration-in-social-media-case.webp "Supreme Court Sides <br/>With Biden Administration , in Social Media Case.<br/>Attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri, and other right-wing individuals, .<br/>Attorneys general in Louisiana and Missouri, and other right-wing individuals, .<br/>previously brought a lawsuit against the government, alleging that it had influenced what social media companies allow on their sites.<br/>In particular, plaintiffs in the case of Murthy v. Missouri questioned whether the Biden administration violated free speech protections amid the pandemic when social networks were instructed to remove COVID misinformation.<br/>In particular, plaintiffs in the case of Murthy v. Missouri questioned whether the Biden administration violated free speech protections amid the pandemic when social networks were instructed to remove COVID misinformation.<br/>On July 4, 2023, Louisiana Judge Terry Doughty <br/>agreed with the plaintiffs and restricted members of the Biden administration from interacting with social media companies in an attempt to moderate their content.<br/>The U.S. Supreme Court struck <br/>down the lower court's ruling by a vote of <br/>6-3 on June 26, 'The Guardian' reports. .<br/>The plaintiffs, without any <br/>concrete link between their injuries <br/>and the defendants’ conduct, , Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion.<br/>... ask us to conduct a review of the <br/>years-long communications between dozens <br/>of federal officials, across different agencies, <br/>with different social-media platforms, <br/>about different topics, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion.<br/>This court’s standing doctrine <br/>prevents us from ‘exercis[ing such] <br/>general legal oversight’ of the <br/>other branches of government, Justice Amy Coney Barrett, via majority opinion.<br/>Ultimately, Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote that the lower court \")
_malli-fill-t.webp "Noize TV")
_hasini-samuel-hot-kiss-ft-fill-t.webp "Channel වල් - පල්")
_supreme-court-dismisses-allegation-of-biden-administration-coercion-in-social-media-content-removal.jpg)
_hasini-samuel-birthday-after-party-video.jpg)
_fill-t-amp-hasini-leak-video-intarview.jpg)
_jennifer-garner-constantly-wept-as-she-prepared-for-her-daughter-violet-to-graduate-from-high-school.jpg)
_leak-hasini-samuel-ft-fill-t.jpg)
_supreme-court-sides-with-biden-administration-in-social-media-case.jpg)
_malli-fill-t.jpg)
_hasini-samuel-hot-kiss-ft-fill-t.jpg)
![[+]](/images/menu.gif){kind=small}